joint case management statement northern district of california

Diversity jurisdiction arises when a civil case involves citizens of different states, and there is more than $75,000 at issue. Commencing March 1, 2007, all judges of the Northern District of California will require the identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal: Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff Washington DC 20530. NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANTS IN NON-PRISONER ACTIONS: However, a defendant may ask to remove a case from state court to federal court if it could have been filed in federal court. Under the terms and conditions set forth below, Defendant shall produce to Plaintiffs two sets of copies of all correspondence, documents, data, email, statements, declarations, affidavits, oral examination transcripts, depositions or any other materials, whether in hard-copy or electronic form, exchanged between Defendant and any non-party or party to the Proposed Acquisition in the course of responding to Plaintiffs' Investigation of or otherwise relating to the Proposed Acquisition, including materials sent or received by Oracle in connection with any litigation arising from the Proposed Acquisition (collectively Defendant's "Proposed Acquisition Materials"). The parties must include the following information in their statement which, A more recent docket listing The Commonwealth Attorney will be responsible for issuing new subpoenas for the continuance date. 3. In lieu of initial disclosures pursuant to Fed. Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. The parties shall exchange preliminary lists, not to exceed 25 per side, of the witnesses they intend to call live at trial, the order they will be called, a brief description of the subjects to which they will testify and the estimated time of direct examination by May 10, 2004. Each party must provide counter designations of deposition testimony no later than June 11, 2004. Lynchburg Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Individual Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Homepages, Show Cause Contempt-Custody, Visitation, Support, Payment Plan Policies for Fines and Costs, Pay Criminal and Other Cases in a Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Forms, Guardians Ad Litem for Children in District 24. If appropriate, the court may require that a party or its representative be present or reasonably available by other means to consider possible settlement. Defendant proposes the following language: 3. Except as otherwise provided by the Protective Order and consistent with the terms of Paragraph 9 below, the disclosures set forth in Paragraph 4.b.1 shall commence forthwith upon entry of the Protective Order by the Court, shall be made on a rolling basis, and shall be completed within 10 business days of the entry of the Protective Order. Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Courts Informational Pamphlet. The parties request that the Court adopt the non-disputed provisions of this Order as the Case Management Order in this case and, as to disputed provisions (indicated herein in italics), request that the Court determine which of the conflicting provisions suggested by each side should be included in the final Order. Deposition Designations. Select a judges name to open that judges web page, then select Standing Orders from the left navigation bar. Within 2 business days of the date this Order is entered by the Court, Plaintiff United States shall submit to Defendant in electronic form a list of the documents produced by Defendant during Plaintiff's Investigation as to which a claim of privilege is in dispute, including an indication of the basis of the challenge. Copyright RPCD Holdings LLC 2003-2023 exclusive of the text of government codes. this JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND DISCOVERY PLAN pursuant to the . a. Interrogatories shall be limited to 15 for Plaintiffs' side and 25 for Defendant, including sub-parts. 1332 Diversity-Personal Property. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex . Sometimes both state and federal courts may have jurisdiction. The parties submit the following joint statement in advance of the January 28, 2021 Case Management Conference. 12. Under the terms and conditions set forth below, Plaintiffs shall produce to Defendant all correspondence, documents, data, email, statements, declarations, affidavits, oral examination transcripts, depositions or any other materials, whether in hard-copy or electronic form, exchanged between Plaintiffs and any non-party in the course of Plaintiffs' Investigation of the Proposed Acquisition (collectively, Plaintiffs' "Investigation Materials"). > Southside Health District > Case Management. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex . Such other matters as may facilitate the just, speedy and inexpensive disposition of this matter. Disclaimer: The materials and information on this website do not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Except in categories of actions exempted by local rule, the district judge or a magistrate judge when authorized by local rule must issue a scheduling order: A represented party must authorize at least one of its attorneys to make stipulations and admissions about all matters that can reasonably be anticipated for discussion at a pretrial conference. Plaintiffs and Defendant shall serve all pleadings and discovery requests, including Rule 45 subpoenas for documents, and shall deliver all correspondence on the other parties' designate by email. OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTENTS OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Commencing July 1, 2011, all judges of the Northern District of California will require identical information in Joint Case Management Statements filed pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9. Official websites use .gov This action arises from an unsolicited bid by Defendant Oracle Corporation ("Oracle") to acquire PeopleSoft, Inc. ("PeopleSoft") (hereinafter referred to as the "Proposed Acquisition"). Northern Dist. PDF Standing Order for All Judges of The Northern District of California Joint CMC Statement - Proposed Order (.docx, 39 KB) Abstract Of Judgment (.pdf, . All written discovery shall be served in a time frame that will permit timely responses to be served in accordance with Paragraph 8. The parties jointly submit this Case Management Statement and [Proposed] Order pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-9 and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of CaliforniaContents of Joint Case Management Statement. A copy of the Order must be served on each defendant. The defense attorney need not appear. The request will be submitted to the Judge and the attorneys will be notified of the Court?s response. Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Opposition to Motion for Discovery Sanctions, Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Reply in Support of Motion for Leave to Amend Pleading, Reply in Support of Motion for Continuance or Extension. 12. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. P. 16 and 26 shall be designated as "case management conferences" in this Court. 4. Other References: Whether the case is suitable for reference to binding arbitration, a special master, or the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 1-4. 2. Except as otherwise stated herein, the parties are in agreement as to the provisions of this Order. PDF United States District Court Northern District of California San Oppositions to any such motions shall be no more than 10 pages in length. Find a Lawyer; Ask a Lawyer ; . Except as otherwise provided by the Protective Order and consistent with the terms of Paragraph 9 below, the disclosures set forth in Paragraph 4.a.1 shall commence forthwith upon entry of the Protective Order by the Court, shall be made on a rolling basis, and shall be completed within 10 business days of the entry of the Protective Order. Failure to comply with this Order or the Local Rules of this Court may result in sanctions. 13. Opposition to motions in limine shall be filed by June 14, 2004. 16. joint case management statement case no. c. Depositions of non-party witnesses shall be no more than one day in length. Under the terms and conditions set forth in Paragraph 4.b.1 & 2 above, Defendant also shall produce to Plaintiffs two sets of copies of all discount request forms, Executive Approval Forms, or other approval documents dated January 1, 2002 through the present relating to the sale of E Business Suite, Financial Management, or Human Resources software applications. VACCINES The State's program to vaccinate people in CDCR custody is moving ahead. 16-9, the parties to the above-entitled action jointly submit this Case Management Statement and Proposed Order. Discovery Period. e. Depositions of the parties' experts shall be conducted after the exchange of the above-referenced reports. Each district court contains a special bankruptcy court that oversees bankruptcy proceedings. Chief, Antitrust Bureau Office of the Attorney General of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, NY 10271 Counsel for Plaintiff States, The Case Management Statement and Proposed Order is hereby adopted by the Court as. Effective November 1, 2018 . See Fed. Discovery and production of confidential information shall be governed by the attached Protective Order, a copy of which shall be included with any discovery requests, notices or subpoenas directed to non-parties. Casetext, Inc. and Casetext are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. and [Proposed] Order pursuant to the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California dated November 1, 2018, Judge Gonzalez Rogers' Standing Order In Civil Cases dated February 24 . In accordance with Civil Local Rule ("L.R.") OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Continuances governed by Rule 8:14. John Doe I, John Doe II, Jane Doe I, Jane Doe IV, Jane Doe V, Jane Doe II and Jane Doe III, US District Court for the Northern District of California, 28 U.S.C. R. Civ. 10. All judges of the Northern District of California require identical information in Joint Case To permit timely third party discovery by Defendant, Plaintiffs' side shall also serve upon Defendant by no later than March 22, 2004, a list of those organizations (e.g., corporations and government entities) that Plaintiffs believe are like to provide witnesses who would testify at trial on Plaintiffs' behalf, live or by deposition. Narrowing of Issues: Issues that can be narrowed by agreement or by motion, suggestions to expedite the presentation of evidence at trial (e.g., through summaries or stipulated facts), and any request to bifurcate issues, claims, or defenses. P. 26(a)(1): 1. The parties agree to the following plan and schedule for discovery and pre-trial disclosures: 5. A proposed order is not necessary. 6. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. These are known as diversity jurisdiction and federal question jurisdiction. Plaintiffs propose the following language: 3. U.S. Department of Justice Consent to Magistrate Judge For All Purposes: Whether all parties will consent to have a magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. Wolk v. Verizon California Inc. - Casetext R. Civ. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia. In no event may the total number of witnesses on the final list of witnesses to be called live exceed 25. Defendant is not required to produce documents or other written materials originally received from Plaintiffs back to the Plaintiffs. PDF Docket 58 CMC Joint Case Management Statement - ALTA United Devon R. Paige, Presiding Judge, Chief Judge, Hon. In criminal cases, if the continuance is granted the defendant and the Commonwealth Attorney must appear on the original court date. 3. By no later than March 22, 2004, Plaintiffs' side shall serve upon Defendant a list of those organizations (e.g., corporations and government entities) that Plaintiffs believe are likely to have discoverable information that Plaintiffs may use to support their claims or defenses. Southside Health District; Locations; Administrative Services. Scheduling: Proposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial. Lock C 11-3916 PJH (N.D. Cal. northern district of california wiley gill, et al., plaintiffs, v. department of justice , et al, defendants. ) The principal legal issue is whether or not the Proposed Acquisition would likely substantially lessen competition in interstate trade and commerce in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. a. Exhibit lists need not include exhibits used solely for purposes of cross-examination or rebuttal. PDF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. (SI) R. Civ. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. In both civil and criminal matters when both parties are represented by counsel and there is an agreed upon continuance, the attorneys may submit a request and order to the Court which shall include the specific case file number of all matters which are the subject of the continuance. PDF Jurisdiction & Service - GovInfo P. 45 at least 5 days before the return date. STANDING ORDER FOR ALL JUDGES. The parties shall serve all motions in limine by June 9, 2004. R. Civ. Definitions "Scheduling," "discovery," or "status" conferences under Fed. The conference may be conducted by the magistrate judge assigned to the case. R. Civ. Demonstrative exhibits to be used by experts that are properly disclosed pursuant to Paragraph 11 may be slightly revised before use, provided that the slightly revised version is served on all counsel of record at least 48 hours before any such exhibit is to be introduced, or otherwise used, at trial. Northern District of California concerning the contents of the joint case management conference statement and Judge Illston's Standing Order. b. 2. 17. Lead trial counsel for each party must be in attendance. / This action having been reassigned to the Honorable Saundra Brown Armstrong, IT IS ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Case Management Program and shall begoverned by Civil L.R. Continuances granted by Judge on motion for good cause. To minimize burdens on non-parties, the party that serves a document subpoena on a non-party pursuant to Rule 45 shall copy any documents produced to that party by the non-party and produce them to the other side within 2 business days of their receipt. Demonstrative exhibits, other than those to be used by experts, do not need to be included on exhibit lists, but unless otherwise agreed or ordered, need to be served on all counsel of record at least 48 hours before any such exhibit may be introduced, or otherwise used, at trial. The availability of nationwide service of process, however, does not make a witness that is otherwise "unavailable" for purposes of Fed. The Eastern District contains 11 judges, and the Western District contains four judges. 7. The motion must comply with all rules generally applicable to Northern District motions and must: The Court may schedule subsequent Case Management Conferences, sua sponte or in response to a stipulated request from the parties. 3. The parties shall exchange proposed stipulations of fact no later than June 7, 2004. An official website of the United States government. Notwithstanding the limitation on the number of depositions that a party may take and the deadline for fact discovery set forth above, the parties shall have the right to subpoena documents from or relating to any witness on the opposing party's preliminary or final witness lists, and to depose any such witness if not previously subpoenaed or deposed since the filing date of this action. If a non-party seeks additional relief from the Court, materials for which additional protection has been sought will not be produced to anyone other than those persons identified in subparagraph b below until the Court has ruled. a. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no later than the date specified in FRCP 26 (f) (amended eff 12/1/15), counsel must file a Joint Case Management Statement addressing all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California (amended eff 11/1/18) - Contents of Joint Case Management Statement, which can be found on the courts website. When an action is initiated, removed, or transferred to the Northern District, the court will issue to the filing party an Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. Since June 2003, the United States and each of the seven Plaintiff States (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have been investigating the Proposed Acquisition (hereinafter, collectively "Plaintiffs' Investigation"). The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 1. Joint Case Management Statement and Proposed Order R. Civ. The parties must include the following information in their statement which, except in unusually complex cases, should not exceed ten pages: 2. Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. in re: roundup products liability litigation . Absent good cause shown, Plaintiffs' side shall be limited to 15 interrogatories, including sub-parts. To the extent not covered by the above, Plaintiffs also shall, under the terms and conditions set forth below, produce all correspondence, documents, data, email, statements, declarations, affidavits, oral examination transcripts, depositions or any other materials exchanged between Plaintiffs and PeopleSoft, a party to the Proposed Acquisition, or its counsel. ) or https:// means youve safely connected to the .gov website. Lynchburg Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. COVID-19 Resources; Legal Blogs; Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System. 18. vince chhabria joint case management statement oakland division . Stipulations of Fact. Federal courts also hold jurisdiction over cases in certain distinctive areas that are controlled by federal law. Case Management - Southside Health District After the Case Management Conference, the judge will enter a Case Management Order. Full title:DAVID WOLK, et al., Plaintiff(s), v. VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC., et al., Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. for the northern district of california san francisco division . december 2, 2020 joint case management statement; 16-md-02741 . P. 16(c). The non-parties shall have 10 business days from the date of receiving notice of the Protective Order in which to review the Protective Order, designate previously-produced materials as confidential under the Protective Order, and to seek additional relief from the Court if they determine that the Protective Order does not adequately protect their confidential materials. Get free summaries of new opinions delivered to your inbox! Any objections to exhibits that are not resolved by the parties after they have conferred will be resolved by the Court. Trial: Whether the case will be tried to a jury or to the court and the expected length of the trial. If there are multiple plaintiffs or multiple defendants, no plaintiff can be a citizen of the same state as any defendant. Joint Case Management Statement - Case Nos. Absent agreement of the parties, the length of depositions provided for in this Scheduling Order may be modified by order of this Court only for good cause shown. 9. Oracle maintains that the Proposed Acquisition would likely not substantially lessen competition in the sale of high function HRM and FMS software and will, instead, result in improved products at reduced costs to customers. M. Randolph Carlson II, Presiding Judge, Hon. There are two main situations in which a federal court holds jurisdiction over a case. PDF United States District Court Northern District of California 3-5 and a description of key discovery or motions necessary to position the parties to negotiate a resolution. mdl no. The Court will hold a hearing on motions in limine on June 17, 2004. They serve lifetime terms. Jurisdiction & Service Pursuant to Rule 26(f), Civil Local Rule 16-9, and the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, the Parties hereby submit the following Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Initial Case Management Conference Statement: Plaintiffs contend that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' claims under 28 U.S.C.. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute. Jay L. Himes, Esq. The serving party will telephone the other parties' principal designate(s) at the time the materials are sent for service to alert them that the materials are being served. The above matter having been reassigned to the Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton. for the joint case management statement. Judges on these courts must be nominated by the U.S. President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Judges' Standing Orders - Home | United States District Court, Northern Counsel shall meet and confer as required by Fed. 4. A more recent docket listing The period for fact discovery shall begin upon the entry of this Order and shall be completed by June 4, 2004 except as otherwise provided in this Order. 14. c. Non-parties shall serve any objections to subpoenas issued pursuant to Fed. Plaintiffs shall produce these Investigation Materials regardless of whether those materials were received informally or through compulsory process, such as a subpoena or Civil Investigative Demand. 2. PDF Standing Order for All Judges of The Northern District of California The parties and affected non-parties may stipulate to additional time for individual depositions. 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW You can explore additional available newsletters here. For the purpose of this Order, a deposition of a party or non-party taken pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall count as one deposition. Case Number: 4:2023cv03277: Filed: June 30, 2023: Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California: Presiding Judge: Kandis A Westmore: Nature of Suit: Other Fraud: Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. FRCP 16(c)(1) (amended eff 12/1/15). Jurisdiction and Service: The basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claims and defendant's counterclaims, whether any issues exist regarding personal jurisdiction or venue, whether any parties remain to be served, and, if any parties remain to be served, a proposed deadline for service. Settlement and ADR: Prospects for settlement, ADR efforts to date, and a specific ADR plan for the case, including compliance with ADR L.R. Discovery: Discovery taken to date, if any, the scope of anticipated discovery, any proposed limitations or modifications of the discovery rules, and a proposed discovery plan pursuant to Fed. Depositions of each party's experts shall be completed by June 11, 2004. f. If required by Fed. : - 3:18-CV-06632-JD 1 Jane C. Mariani, SBN 313666 Law Office of Jane C. Mariani 584 Castro Street, #687 . a. This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. Amendment of Pleadings: The extent to which parties, claims, or defenses are expected to be added or dismissed and a proposed deadline for amending the pleadings. The parties shall exchange (page and line number) designations of deposition testimony to be offered at trial no later than June 7, 2004. In the event the Court declines to enter Defendant's proposed Paragraph 4.a.3, Defendant proposes April 15, 2004 as the date for Plaintiffs' disclosure of trial witnesses, and April 29, 2004, for Defendant's disclosure of trial witnesses. During the interim period described in subparagraph a, materials exchanged pursuant to Paragraph 4 may only be reviewed by counsel of record for the parties. PDF 2 United States District Court Northern District of California Oakland Doe I et al v. Google LLC 3:2023cv02431 | US District Court for the
Anne Arundel County Basketball Schedule, Leyara Defiance Of The Fall, Lake Travis To Fredericksburg, Articles J